logic model: "UDL-aligned practices positively impact expectancy and value"

Proponents of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) claim its flexibility can lead to improved educational achievement (engagement, expertise, performance) for diverse learners. In this context, “diverse learners” are populations of marginalized students for whom evidence of achievement/performance gaps exist; these groups include (but are not limited to) students with disabilities, students of color, students with low socioeconomic backgrounds, and students with linguistically diverse backgrounds (e.g., ESL students). Unfortunately, while there is evidence that current instructional practices are not effective for diverse learners, primary and secondary research measuring the success of UDL-modeled curricula is significantly lacking. As shown in my logic model (above), I am interested in exploring the impact of UDL-aligned practices on the students’ expectancy and values. I’m specifically interested in studying these effects in undergraduate populations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.